Delivery versus Payment (DvP) in finance is a settlement procedure where the transfer of securities happens simultaneously with the transfer of funds. It’s essentially a ‘cash on delivery’ system for financial assets. This simultaneous exchange is crucial for mitigating settlement risk, which is the risk that one party in a transaction will fail to meet its obligations. Imagine buying a stock and paying for it, but the seller never delivers the stock. Or vice versa – a seller delivers the stock, but the buyer never pays. DvP eliminates this possibility by ensuring both actions occur at the same time.
The core principle behind DvP is the reduction of principal risk. Principal risk arises when one party has already fulfilled their obligation (either by delivering the securities or paying the funds) before receiving the counterparty’s performance. DvP eliminates this lag, making transactions much safer and more efficient. It’s a fundamental mechanism for maintaining the integrity of financial markets.
Here’s a breakdown of how DvP typically works:
- Trade Execution: The buyer and seller agree on the terms of the transaction, including the type and quantity of securities, the price, and the settlement date.
- Settlement Instructions: Both parties send instructions to their respective custodians or clearing agents, detailing the securities and funds involved in the transaction.
- Matching of Instructions: The central securities depository (CSD) or clearinghouse matches the instructions from both parties to ensure they align. Any discrepancies are flagged and resolved.
- Simultaneous Transfer: On the settlement date, the CSD or clearinghouse facilitates the simultaneous transfer of securities from the seller to the buyer and funds from the buyer to the seller. This occurs electronically within the CSD’s or clearinghouse’s system.
- Confirmation: Once the transfers are complete, both parties receive confirmation that the transaction has settled successfully.
DvP comes in different models, mainly categorized by the timing of finality:
- Model 1 (Gross DvP): This is the most conservative approach. Each transaction is settled individually and on a gross basis. Securities and funds are exchanged immediately for each trade, offering the lowest level of settlement risk.
- Model 2 (Net DvP): Transactions are netted against each other over a period of time (usually a day). Only the net amount of securities or funds needs to be transferred. This improves efficiency but introduces a small amount of credit risk as the settlement is not truly simultaneous for each individual trade.
- Model 3 (DvP with a central counterparty (CCP)): A CCP interposes itself between the buyer and the seller, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. This centralizes settlement risk and provides guarantees that settlement will occur even if one party defaults. This model enhances market efficiency and reduces systemic risk.
The implementation of DvP systems has significantly enhanced the stability and efficiency of global financial markets. By reducing settlement risk, DvP promotes investor confidence, encourages greater participation in the market, and contributes to the overall health of the financial system. Without DvP, the potential for settlement failures could trigger systemic crises, as the failure of one party to meet its obligations could cascade through the market, leading to widespread losses and instability.
/settlement1-0dbc14c3f23042ad99b48858670e485b.jpg)
1200×800 delivery payment dvp definition from www.investopedia.com 
600×360 dvpr definition dvpr dvpr stands design from acronymsandslang.com