The 1909 Finance Bill, often called the “People’s Budget,” was a highly controversial piece of legislation introduced by David Lloyd George, then Chancellor of the Exchequer in the Liberal government of H.H. Asquith. It aimed to fund extensive social welfare reforms, including old-age pensions, national insurance, and increased spending on the Royal Navy, in a period of growing social and geopolitical tensions.
The budget proposed significant tax increases, primarily targeting the wealthy. Key provisions included:
- Increased Income Tax: The standard rate of income tax was raised, and a “super-tax” was introduced on incomes exceeding £5,000 per year.
- Land Value Taxes: This was the most contentious aspect. Taxes were levied on the unearned increment of land value (i.e., the increase in value not due to the owner’s efforts), undeveloped land, and mineral rights. These taxes were intended to redistribute wealth and break the power of large landowners.
- Increased Death Duties: Taxes on inherited estates were increased, further impacting the landed gentry.
- Increased Duties on Tobacco and Spirits: These were aimed at raising revenue from the working class, although they were less controversial than the land taxes.
The bill sparked intense political debate. The Liberal government argued that the reforms were necessary to address poverty and inequality, and to maintain Britain’s position as a global power. They framed the budget as a means of making the wealthy contribute their fair share to society.
The Conservative Party, heavily supported by the landed aristocracy, vehemently opposed the budget. They argued that the land taxes were confiscatory, would damage the economy, and represented an attack on private property rights. They also criticized the increased government spending as fiscally irresponsible.
The House of Commons passed the Finance Bill, but the House of Lords, dominated by hereditary peers, rejected it. This unprecedented action triggered a constitutional crisis. Traditionally, the Lords did not reject money bills. The Liberals argued that the Lords were exceeding their constitutional powers and obstructing the will of the elected government.
The rejection led to two general elections in 1910. The Liberals, supported by Labour and Irish Nationalist parties, managed to retain power, although with a reduced majority. This outcome was interpreted as a mandate to proceed with the budget.
Eventually, after the second election, the Lords reluctantly passed the 1909 Finance Bill in April 1910. The crisis also led to the Parliament Act of 1911, which significantly curtailed the power of the House of Lords, preventing them from vetoing money bills and limiting their ability to delay other legislation.
The 1909 People’s Budget was a landmark event in British history. It not only funded important social reforms but also precipitated a constitutional crisis that reshaped the relationship between the two houses of Parliament. It remains a significant example of fiscal policy being used as a tool for social and political change.